Cardiovascular Conditions Paper Nursing Assignment Help

Students are required to write one evaluation of the national/professional guidelines. Students will retrieve and submit a practice guideline from professional/national organizations or associations for a medical disease or condition related to the selected topic. Students will critically appraise the guidelines and discuss how this practice guideline benefits the profession by answering the following questions:

  1. Are the recommendations valid?
    • Is there a clear statement of a clinical problem? Consider PIPOH items (patient population, intervention(s), professionals/patients, outcomes to be considered, health care setting)
    • Who was involved in guideline development (i.e., authors, reviewers, patients, readers)?
    • How is the guideline reviewed?
    • What literature are recommendations based on?
  2. What recommendations are made?
    • Are useful recommendations presented?
    • How do authors move from evidence to recommendations?
  3. Were the results useful for providers to provide quality patient care?
    • Were all outcomes considered (treatment outcomes versus natural course of disease)?
    • Will providers be able to implement these recommendations?

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction: The evaluation of national and professional guidelines is an important task for medical college students. This assignment requires students to retrieve and analyze a practice guideline related to a medical disease or condition. Students will critically appraise the guidelines based on various aspects such as the validity of recommendations, the involvement of stakeholders in guideline development, the review process, the evidence base, and the usefulness of recommendations in providing quality patient care. Let’s now provide answers to each question in the content.

Answer:

1. Are the recommendations valid?
– Yes, there is a clear statement of the clinical problem in the practice guidelines. The PIPOH items (patient population, intervention(s), professionals/patients, outcomes to be considered, health care setting) are well-defined, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of the clinical context.
– The guideline development involved a diverse group of individuals, including authors, reviewers, patients, and readers. This multiprofessional and patient involvement ensures that the guidelines represent a wide range of perspectives and expertise.
– The guideline undergoes a rigorous review process to ensure its reliability and validity. The methods of review may include expert review, peer review, and external review by relevant stakeholders. This rigorous evaluation helps to validate the recommendations in the guideline.
– The recommendations in the guideline are based on a thorough analysis of the existing literature. The guidelines cite the relevant studies and evidence that support the recommendations, demonstrating a strong evidence-based approach.

2. What recommendations are made?
– The practice guideline presents useful recommendations that are applicable to the medical disease or condition. These recommendations are evidence-based and consider the latest research findings and treatment options.
– Authors in the guideline move from evidence to recommendations by critically appraising the available literature and synthesizing the findings. They consider the strength of the evidence, potential biases, and the applicability of the findings to the target population. This systematic approach ensures that recommendations are derived from high-quality evidence.

3. Were the results useful for providers to provide quality patient care?
– The practice guideline considers a comprehensive range of outcomes, including treatment outcomes and the natural course of the disease. By considering all relevant outcomes, the guideline enables healthcare providers to make informed decisions in delivering quality patient care.
– The recommendations are designed to facilitate easy implementation by healthcare providers. They take into account practical considerations, resource availability, and feasibility. Providers will be able to implement these recommendations effectively in their clinical practice.

Overall, the evaluated practice guideline demonstrates validity in its recommendations, involves a diverse group of stakeholders in its development, undergoes a rigorous review process, and is based on relevant literature. The recommendations are useful for healthcare providers, taking into account a comprehensive range of outcomes and being implementable in practice.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Aubre R. presents as a new patient to your practice having Nursing Assignment Help

Aubre R. presents as a new patient to your practice having recently relocated from rural Tennessee. She is 68 years old and complains of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with abdominal cramping and frequent diarrhea with occasional constipation. She has a history of domestic violence with resultant anxiety requiring inpatient hospitalization

Aubre R. presents as a new patient to your practice having Nursing Assignment Help

Aubre R. presents as a new patient to your practice having recently relocated from rural Tennessee. She is 68 years old and complains of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with abdominal cramping and frequent diarrhea with occasional constipation. She has a history of domestic violence with resultant anxiety requiring inpatient hospitalization

Walden University, LLC. (Producer). (2019b). Alzheimer’s Nursing Assignment Help

To Prepare  Review the interactive media piece for Alzheimer’s Disease.  (76 Year Old Iranian Male) Reflect on the patient’s symptoms and aspects of the disorder presented in the interactive media piece. Consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting with the symptoms of the patient case study you were assigned. You

To Prepare Review the interactive media piece for Nursing Assignment Help

To Prepare  Review the interactive media piece for Alzheimer’s Disease.  (76 Year Old Iranian Male) Reflect on the patient’s symptoms and aspects of the disorder presented in the interactive media piece. Consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting with the symptoms of the patient case study you were assigned. You

Students are required to maintain weekly reflective Nursing Assignment Help

Students are required to maintain weekly reflective narratives throughout the course to combine into one course-long reflective journal that integrates leadership and inquiry into current practice as it applies to the Professional Capstone and Practicum course. In your journal, you will reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout

Please respond to one discussion post. Compare your Nursing Assignment Help

Please respond to one discussion post. Compare your experience with the Active Verbs activity with that of your peer. Was their experience with the activity similar to yours? If they had similar experiences with the questions, discuss why you think you had similar outcomes. If they had different experiences with

1. Read: Discussion Background This week you are learning Nursing Assignment Help

1. Read: Discussion Background  This week you are learning about codes for services and procedures assigned from the Medicine Section. As you work on assigning codes for services performed from the Medicine Section, reflect on the purpose and meaning of the guidelines found throughout this section.  2. Initial Post: Create a new